Tampilkan postingan dengan label Google. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Google. Tampilkan semua postingan

Apple scores crucial patent victory against Samsung; FRAND patent counter strategy of Google at risk

Posted by Unknown Kamis, 15 Maret 2012 0 komentar
Photo credit: Wikipedia
As reported by Foss Patents, The dutch court has ruled that Samsung has to offer fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing terms to Apple for patents essential to 3G/UMTS standard. The ruling will also prevent Samsung from seeking injunctions against Apple's products, using these standards.

This is a crucial victory for Apple which could have major impact not just on Samsung, but also on Google and Android as it limits the use of standards essential patents (SEP) as legal tools against competitors.

Netherlands court ruling
The court has ruled that Samsung is obligated to offer FRAND licensing terms to Apple for the standards essential 3G/UMTS patents. The court said that Samsung cannot pursue injunctions against Apple as it appears inclined to discuss licensing terms — Apple has only objected to the royalty rate, terming it high.

The court also said that Samsung cannot assert 3G/UMTS patent on iPhone 4S due to "patent exhaustion". Apple had purchased baseband chips from Qualcomm which already had licenses to 3G/UMTS patents which Samsung is asserting, which logically means that they should be covered by the said patents.

To pursue case against Apple, Samsung wanted to terminate its agreement with Qualcomm, but the court ruled otherwise saying that Samsung cannot do so due to the commitments made to ETSI to grant irrevocable licenses for its 3G/UMTS patents. ETSI is the standards body in charge of 3G.

This means that there will be no extra royalty on iPhone 4S, as it is already paid by Qualcomm.

The only piece of moderately positive news for Samsung was that it can pursue cases against Apple for phones which used Infineon chips until January 2011 as well as Intel baseband chips (Intel acquired Infineon's mobile baseband chip division). Though, Apple has a chance to apply for patent exhaustion till March 28.

Impact on Samsung
The dutch courts decision effectively means that Samsung's, and indeed Google's, main counter strategy against Apple of using SEP's is not working. Samsung has already lost similar cases in France and Italy and had withdrawn a case in Germany, albeit with an option to sue later.
The verdict on patent exhaustion means that Samsung cannot bring out cases against some devices like will iPhone 4S, which use parts already covered by the patents. In our opinion, this was a very aggressive stand taken by Samsung, where chances of victory where anyway small, hence the verdict is not a surprise.

Though, Samsung can negotiate for royalty on devices using Infineon and Intel basebands, the royalty rate will likely be low as they will not only infringe indirectly but will also involve SEPs.
So far Samsung has not won a single offensive claim against Apple anywhere in the world and this latest verdict is in line with the other verdicts, albeit much bigger. Samsung may have to eventually opt to settle with Apple and pay a royalty, just like it is currently paying Microsoft. As earlier reported, Apple had offered licensing deal to Samsung, with some important caveats to maintain product differentiation.


Impact on Google and Android ecosystem
This ruling also increases the pressure on Google. Google's primary strategy against both Apple and Microsoft is to leverage SEPs for cross-licensing without paying additional royalties or ask for a high royalty rate like 2.25% with Microsoft.

This ruling, and all previous ruling, indicates that this is not an effective strategy as the courts are not warming to the idea of suing based on SEPs, effectively removing the biggest weapon in Google's arsenal. Google and its OEMs will also not be able to command a high royalty rate which could be as low as 2 cents (depends on the patent though).

Apple and Microsoft now have the upper hand as a lot of their patents are not SEPs and hence they are free to charge a higher rate. Many Android OEMs are already rumoured to be paying Microsoft between US$5-$15 per device as royalty for patents and may now have to pay Apple a royalty.

Microsoft and Apple will succeed in moving Android from a free OS to one with a high patent risk and hidden costs, reducing its lucrativeness to Android developers. This could move the lower end market from Android to Windows and other proprietary OS'.

But this outcome depends on a lot of other issues and, unless a settlement occurs, we are a long way away from resolution, even though victory in the current round goes to Apple and Microsoft.

Ahh... It seems I have been posting only legal and patent related issues recently. Sigh... I don't expect this to reduce any time soon :(

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Yahoo takes Facebook to court: Start of the software/internet patent wars?

Posted by Unknown Rabu, 14 Maret 2012 0 komentar
After threatening Facebook with a lawsuit last month, Yahoo has now acted upon the threat filing a case and accusing Facebook of infringing on 10 of its patents. The alleged infringed patents include those relating to messaging, news feeds, advertising, preventing click frauds and privacy controls. 

Yahoo had contacted Facebook recently asking for royalties, but filed the case after Facebook refused to pay them. 

Yahoo had earlier sued Google in 2004 for patent infringement related to "pay per click advertising method", which Google settled for ~US$230 million.

Yahoo background — Great past, Faltering future
Yahoo, one off the early Internet giant, has been on the downward trend for some time. It lost its premier search position to Google before surrendering it to Microsoft. 

Yahoo has also been unsuccessful in building up a social networking property and tried to acquire Facebook in 2006, but failed.

Similar to handing search to Microsoft, Yahoo made a blunder by integrating Facebook across its sites from 2008. This significantly increased the reach of Facebook, while the importance of Yahoo diminished. 

Combined, this means that Yahoo is not a major player in its two most important business areas, which is reflected in its continuing declining value post-Microsoft offer to purchase Yahoo was rejected by its board.

Currently majority of Yahoo's value comes from its 35% stake in Yahoo Japan and 40% stake in China's Alibaba. According to a recent note by J.P.Morgan, Yahoo's US assets were valued at an enterprise value of US$6.9bn, stake in Yahoo Japan at US$5.7bn and that in Alibaba at US$9.9bn. Yahoo also has cash of , along with a cash of ~US$2bn. This means that the core operations contribute less than one-third to the total value, a clear sign of a dying company.


Yahoo — claims and potential settlement terms
According to Yahoo, nearly all the technology that Facebook uses is based upon its patents. Yahoo states that before Facebook incorporated its social networking technology, it was one of the worst performing advertising sites on the Internet.

Yahoo has not attached any value to its patents but has instead left to the courts or a future settlement with Facebook to decide. 

In the filing, Yahoo also say "Even if Facebook were to subsequently pay past due royalties, it would still enjoy a market share it has developed during its period of 'free riding' on Yahoo!'s intellectual property. Yahoo! would likewise lose its portion of the market share for this period. Due to the difficulty in predicting whether, if at all, such market share can be recovered, Yahoo!'s harm cannot be compensated by payment of past due royalties alone." Clearly Yahoo is trying to attack Facebook before its IPO.

It should be noted that according to USPTO Yahoo has 1,029 patents while Facebook has only 21. Though this does not include the patents bought by both of them have including the important patent #6,269,361 Yahoo bought from Overture, which so far has not been included in the case against Facebook, but could be added later.


Yahoo's patent case against Google
Before filing the case against Facebook, Yahoo had file a patent lawsuit only once, in 2004 against Google. At that time Yahoo had settled for 2.7 million shares of Google indicating a value of US$230 million (at IPO price of US$85/share), but the case was only limited to one Overture patent #6,269,361. 

At that time, it appeared that Yahoo settled for a very low amount as it had purchased Overture for US$1.6bn, whose only asset was the said patent.
 

Merit in Yahoo's position?
While Yahoo may appear to be a 'patent troll' to some and most of the blogosphere is certainly against it, Yahoo has a rich treasure trove of patents.
It had earlier sued and forced Google into a settlement, though it can be argued that Yahoo didn't gain much as compared to its investment.

IEEE had earlier given Yahoo the highest score in its 2011 Patent Power Scorecard in the Communication/Internet services category. While that itself is not an indication of the merits of this particular case, it does indicate that Yahoo has a high quality patent portfolio which it has not utilised, aggressively, so far.

One of the argument being used against Yahoo is that most of its patents are common and obvious today. But that could well work in Yahoo's favour as they were not generic when they were filed and hence their becoming generic today indicates good innovation. Though it remains to be seen how this argument holds up in court.

Another argument being used is that software and related patent should not be used for litigation. While this was largely practiced by the major companies till now, the law doesn't stop companies from enforcing them.

But the major sore point in this case, as well as in the case against Google, is that Yahoo has acted very opportunistically. Yahoo filed a case against Google when it was about to go for an IPO, similarly it has filed a case against Facebook when it is in the process of an IPO — Both, not the best times for a company to fight a legal case.


What next
Like other big software/Internet companies, Yahoo had not sued companies for patent infringement and it was more interested in improving its operations rather than generating revenues through litigation's.

This time the situation with Yahoo is different. Yahoo is on a decline and is looking to sell off its once crown jewels, Yahoo Japan and Alibaba, after which it will be left only with the under performing assets. 

The big danger of Yahoo winning a swift or significant judgment against Facebook is that it might become a patent troll either directly after selling of its other assets or selling the patents to a third part who will carry out its dirty work.

This will open a Pandora's box, and may drag the entire software industry harming all the players and what was once a (relatively) safer segment in terms of litigation's might turn a minefield.

Additional sources: Ars Technica

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Apple v/s Google: Motorola tried to bully Apple in patent negotiations

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 13 Maret 2012 0 komentar
We had earlier reported that Apple had offered cross-licensing deals to Motorola and Samsung, but the talks failed due to unknown reasons and the patent wars escalated.

Now, in a document filed by the European Commissions (EC) on the proposed merger of Google and Motorola, it has appeared that the licensing deal didn't happen as Motorola/Google tried to intimidate Apple into licensing ALL of its patents, something unacceptable to Apple.

The EC document does not go into much detail on the licensing deals, but there are two interesting points. One relates to Android cross-licensing and the other relates Apple's patents and potential carve outs.

Android cross-licensing
Even before the Google-Motorola acquisition has closed, the negotiations between Motorola and Apple involved cross-licensing benefits for all Android OEMs, so that the deal will be acceptable to Google. Google apparently tried using the standards essential patents (SEP) of Motorola to benefit its entire Android ecosystem, across all OEMs.According to the EC document,
"In the context of Motorola Mobility's negotiations with Apple in late 2011 concerning a potential cross-licensing settlement, the parties discussed the scope of any potential settlement in the event that the Google/Motorola Mobility transaction is closed. From the information available to the Commission, this option envisaged a cross-licence possibly to the benefit of all Android OEMs but also with mutual carve-outs."

At the same time, Google also claimed that “it does not control Android and therefore Android's market share should not be attributed to Google but to each of the various OEMs building Android based phones.”

Now, if the market share needs to be attributed to individual Android OEM’s they should be the ones striking deals with Apple, rather Google trying to use Motorola’s essential patents in forcing Apple to do so. Clear double speaking by Google.

Recently Apple had convinced the court to direct Motorola to ask Google to hand over documents related to Android development, which was opposed by Motorola on grounds that both the companies are different. But if they can jointly negotiate cross licensing, I think the documents can also be handed over.

Licensing of Apple's patents
The other major, and more important piece of information, was that Motorola and Google wanted all the Apple's patents to come under cross licensing, so that any future litigation could be avoided. As the EC document says,
"For instance, according to Apple, Motorola Mobility has insisted that Apple cross-licenses its full non-SEP portfolio in exchange for Motorola Mobility's SEPs. Apple also argues that its refusal to accede to this demand led Motorola Mobility to sue Apple in an attempt to exclude Apple's products from the market. On the terms of Apple's own argument, Motorola Mobility's allegedly anti-competitive behavior in this regard well precedes the merger at issue in the present decision."

This was not acceptable to Apple as it wanted "carve outs" which would exclude some of the patents from the licensing as well as limit use restrictions, to keep Android and Google under control. Apple has preferred to  use patents as strategic tools rather than as revenue generator and this strategy is in line with that.

On the other hand, Google and Motorola tried to use their standards essential patents to bypass all the licensing problems for all the Android devices and OEMs.

This approach was not acceptable to Apple and something we don't think will be acceptable to Microsoft.


Google and Motorola equally responsible as Apple
This interesting piece of news highlights that while Apple and Microsoft may be considered as "patent trolls" by many wanting to either see Android dead (Apple) or make it as an important source of revenue (Microsoft), Google and Motorola are also to blame for the escalation of the patent wars.

The fate of the patent cases would likely be decided on the approach the regulators and courts take to licensing FRAND patents. If the regulators/courts allow Google to earn a high royalty fee, then it will have a huge impact, on both current licensing costs as well as future standards.

Current licensing cost will increase significantly as the other standards patent holders also increase the royalty rate. For ex. Google wants 2.25% royalty for 2% of patents as part of a standard where Microsoft currently pays currently 2 cents for the other 98% patents.

It will also massively increase the value of the future standards essentially patents, as they can be use to cripple competitions, something which will not be appreciated by the regulators.

While I am not a patent expert, I expect the essential patents to be eventually licensed at far lower terms than what Google wants. Apple has an excellent chance of enforcing carve outs and may extract significant royalty fee from the Android OEMs. This combined with Microsoft’s current royalty, will make Android infinitely less attractive than other options like Windows mobile.


Further reading:

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Oracle could drop three more patents against Google; Case could become copyright infringement

Posted by Unknown Senin, 12 Maret 2012 0 komentar
Oracle has offered to withdraw three more patents in the case against Google/Android in exchange for a spring trial, albeit with a few caveats. If this happens Oracle will be left with only 2 of the initial 7 patent infringement filed against Oracle and the case could largely become a copyright case rather than a patent infringement one. This will come as a big boost to Google and Android.

Case history
In August 2010, Oracle sued Google citing patent and copyright infringement over the use of Java in Android. The suit alleged that Android, Android SDK and the Dalvik cache violated seven patents and contained copies of the original java code.

According to Oracle, Google used part of the Apache Harmony Java implementation in Android without a license to java patents and copyrights

In January 2011, Florian Muller (of Foss Patents) published an article claiming that Google copied 37 files directly from Java without license. But it later emerged that they were likely test files. Still, from a legal angle, it increased the risk on Google.

In June 2011, Google filed a document stating that Oracle wanted between US$1.4 and US$6.1 billion as settlement charges. It later appeared that Oracle wanted US$2.6 billion.

Later in the same month, USPTO rejected 17 of 21 claims in one of the patents, though 4 of the claims remained along with 118 contained in the other 6 patents which were not contested.

In July 2011, Judge asked Oracle to rethink about the US$2.6 billion value and suggested a starting point of ~US$100 million.

Oracle narrowed it down to US$2 billion but in January 2012 the judge refused to proceed with the trial asking Oracle to file more appropriate claim value.

At this time, Oracle wanted to separate the patent claims from copyright to accelerate the case, but the judge declined the request

Later in February, Oracle dropped the patent of which 17 of the 21 claims where earlier reject by USPTO.

Current status
Oracle is interested in an early start to the case claiming that delay of every day is harming Oracle irreparably by diverting the Java developer ecosystem to Android.

Oracle has now again stated that it wants the trial to start in mid-April and hence could withdraw 3 of the remaining 5 patents (2 have already been withdrawn). The remaining 2 include patent 520 and RE104 - the Gosling patent, which will expire in December.

Oracle though do put in a caveat that only the rejected claims of the patent will be withdrawn and if the claims on the other patents are accepted than they will come back into play.

Based on Oracle's interest for a quick trial and the judge's insistence on conducting both the patent and the copyright trials simultaneously, Oracle might have to make further concessions. 

Any further concession will further hit Oracle in the case, and it might eventually end up becoming a copyright case or even a 1 patent case, severely undercutting Oracle's initial assertion of massive infringement by Oracle. 

At this stage it appears that the liability on Google could be severely limited, even Oracle manages to win, as the case is turning into a copyright infringement rather than a patent cum copyright infringement case.

Source: Foss Patents

Baca Selengkapnya ....

January 2012 US smartphone market share: Google's Android wins; RIM, Microsoft Windows lose

Posted by Unknown Sabtu, 10 Maret 2012 0 komentar

According to the latest data released by Comscore, US smartphone subscribers grew by 3.5% QoQ to reach 101.3 million units in January 2012.

In terms of smartphone platforms, Android and IOS (Apple) continue to gain market share, while Microsoft's share declined in spite of the initial launch of Lumia 710 by Nokia. RIM's market share also declined.

Google's Android and Apple's IOS continue their strong performance 
Android's impressive run continued and it gained 1.3% share in Jan 2012 to reach 48.6% market share.

IOS registered a small decline by 0.1% after gaining an impressive 2.2% in the last three months.

Both the platforms now combined account for an impressive 78.1% of the total subscribers. 

Microsoft's Windows continues to lose market share
Windows share declined by 0.3% in January, in spite of the launch of Lumia 710, which also ranked very high in the initial customer delight rankings.

But, both Microsoft and Nokia would be hoping that this trend will reverse in the coming months, as Lumia 800 and 900 sales number are incorporated.

Nokia has never been able to crack the US market, even in the old days of global domination, and would be hoping that Lumia finally gives it a strong foothold in the US.

For Microsoft also, this will the last big chance, because if Nokia fails, then the Windows platform will be dead and revenues from the the mobile segment will be limited to royalties from Android.

Globally, Nokia's Windows based handsets have done well in 4Q 2011 selling 0.9 million handsets and becoming the largest Windows smartphone vendor with a market share of 33%.


RIM - decline continues
RIM's market share continued to decline, with a loss of 0.8% share in the month of January. Overall, in the last 12 months, RIM's share has halved - from 30.4% in Jan 2011 to 15.2% in Jan 2012. There doesn't seem any near term catalyst for RIM, so expect its share to further decline


US smartphone market share historical trend


Baca Selengkapnya ....

Google & Asus teaming to launch a low cost tablet; Potential Jelly Bean device

Posted by Unknown Jumat, 09 Maret 2012 0 komentar
It appears the close relationship between Asus and Google, as touted by Benson Lin, Corporate VP at Asus, has just gone closer. According to Digitimes, Google is working with Asus to develop a new 7 inch tablet which could be launched as early as May this year.

This nicely ties in with rumours of Q2 2012 launch of Jelly Bean and Asus' assertion that they will be among the first to release Jelly Bean on their devices. Though, according to Slashgear, the device will have ICS — in which case one can expect a quick upgrade to Jelly Bean very soon after launching.

Rumoured device
The device is rumoured to be a low cost device targeting iPad and, more importantly, other rivals like Kindle Fire with a price tag of US$199-$249. Google has no control over Amazon, even though Amazon is using a derivative of Android, and in a short period has become the largest Android tablet maker, even though it may be more appropriate to call Kindle Fire an Amazon device rather than a tablet.

The device is also expected to have a 7 inch screen with a high resolution of 1280X800, higher than other low cost tablets.

The new device could also be the first to have the new unified gaming platform, which Google is developing on the lines of the recently launched Play which consolidated content across apps, music, video and books.

It could also be among the first device to get the new Jelly Bean updated.

Why Google choose Asus
According to the sources, Google began looking at Taiwanese co-partners to build a new tablet in end 2011. Presumably Google didn't want Motorola, to avoid sending a negative signal to other device manufacturers, who are already silently worried about Google-Motorola relationship.

Other Android device makers like HTC wanted more control and were also not willing for a low cost device due to the potential damage to their brands.

While Asus lacked in-house research and design capabilities, it was still selected as it was willing to play a second fiddle to Google, allowing it complete freedom in the design process. Acer is believed to be looking at this opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the Android platform while also making inroads in the US market. 

Asus had sold 1.8 million tablets in 2011 and has projected minimum sales of 3.0 million tablets in 2012. But the company has set a very stiff internal target of 6.0 million units, more than triple the current sales level, which will see it overtake Samsung. It is with this in mind, that Asus seems to be going after a low cost device, when HTC seems to have clearly rejected it.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Google Play replaces Android market; unifies content

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 06 Maret 2012 0 komentar

Google has replaced the Android market with a new service, Google Play. Google Play will replace Android Market, Google Music and the Google eBookstore and unify content across these services.

In line with Google's strategic direction, Play is a cloud based service - apps, music, books and movies will be stored online..

According to Google, Play includes:
  • Up to 20,000 songs for free and buy millions of new tracks
  • More than 450,000 Android apps and games
  • World's largest selection of eBooks
  • Movie renting
For the next 7 days, Google will be offering a different album, book, video rental and Android app for a special price every day. Also collections of hip-hop, rock and country albums will be sold at US$3.99, some movies at 99 cents as well as certain selected apps will be available starting from 49 cents, this week.

Android market on some of the phones have already started upgrading to Play, but some of the tablets like Xoom have still not been sent the upgrade.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Judge asks Google, Motorola to hand over sensitive documents to Apple

Posted by Unknown 0 komentar
According to a Bloomberg news report, Google and Motorola have been ordered by a US judge to handover documents related to development of the Android operating system to Google. The two companies have also been asked to handover documents relating to the merger of Google with Motorola.

Background
The fight has its root in the lawsuit filed by Apple against HTC in March 2010 claiming that HTC's products infringed on 10 of Apple's patents.

The fight between Apple and Motorola started when Motorola filed a lawsuit against Apple in October 2010 claiming that iPhones, iPads, iPod touches and even some Mac violated Motorola's patents. In total, Motorola's four complaints cited 18 patents, which according to it were infringed.

Later Motorola joined the Apple-HTC lawsuit asking the judge to invalidate 20 of Apple's patents on its products.

After this Apple turned its attention towards Motorola, and in the same month, October 2010, filed two lawsuits against Motorola claiming that its products violated six of Apple's multi-touch and OS patents.

This particular case relates to the October 2010 lawsuit filed by Apple.

Preliminary court judgment
In a March 2 filing, Apple's attorneys had asked for the documents stating “The Android/Motorola acquisition discovery is highly relevant to Apple’s claims and defenses."

The judge apparently agreed with the assertion, and has asked Motorola and its soon-to-be-parent Google to submit sensitive documents related to the development of Android as well as related to the merger between the two companies. 

Google is so far not a party to the lawsuit but the judge expected that because of their relationship Motorola should submit those documents stating “Motorola shall be expected to obtain full and immediate compliance by Google with Apple’s liability discovery demands.”

Judge proposes...Motorola opposes
 As expected Motorola has opposed the request arguing that Google and Motorola are two different companies saying “Google’s employees and documents are not within the ‘possession, custody, or control’ of Motorola, and Motorola cannot force Google to produce documents or witnesses over Google’s objections.” Google has so far not commented on the judgment.

The judge has next round of the case is scheduled to be held in June 2012,  which will address the issue of six Apple patents and three Motorola patents, according to Bloomberg.

Source: Ars Technica, Bloomberg, Engadget

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Google increases Android's apps size — tackles security loophole, improves refunds

Posted by Unknown Senin, 05 Maret 2012 0 komentar

In a blog post titled Android Apps Break the 50MB Barrier, Google has said that the max app size has now been increased from 50MB to 4GB. 

Currently apps get around the 50MB limit by forcing the users to download "sd data" outside the market which has security issues, as Google has no control over what data is downloaded.

The refunding policy has also been changed so that the refund will start only after the app has been completely downloaded — which is a welcome change.
Current limit of 50Mb is avoided through data download
Currently Android market only allows an app to be upto 50MB in size. This works for most applications like productivity suites, timers, video players etc.

But many games already have overshoot the 50MB mark and get around the android market limits by forcing users to update outside the market through wifi or 3G from the developers website.

Users also, are not able to see the total size of the app before buying, which is important  on devices with limited storage memory.

What the update addresses
  • APK files still limited to 50MB
  • Every app to have up to 2 expansion files each limited to 2GB
  • So the total app size has been increase to 4.05GB
  • The total size, including the expansion files, will be seen before
  • downloading
  • Android market will be hosting the file
  • The 15-minute refund period won't start till the entire
  • app, including the expansion, is downloaded

Benefits
The current limit of 50MB was arbitrary and was easily bypassed by the app developers. What this update forces the developers is to use the Android market for the sd data also.

This has two main advantages:
  • Closing security loopholes
  • Better refunds
Closing security loopholes
Because the "sd data" was downloaded outside the market, Google had absolutely no control over it. So a rogue app developer, could make the apk harmless, but the data download could potentially have a malware code.

With this update, Google is closing this huge loophole as the entire data will be hosted in the market and only the approved data, checked by Google, will be downloaded by the users. This is in-line with recent Google initiatives like Bouncer and running apps in emulators to check for rogue behaviour.

Better refunds
Another issue previously was that, the refunds process started after the apk was downloaded. Many times the refund windows used to expire even before the sd data was downloaded, which made the refund process meaningless.

This welcome update tackles this issue also, as the windows will start only when the entire app including the data will be downloaded. So you can not actually test the app for 15 minutes to see whether or not you would like to keep it

Conclusion
Overall a very welcome update, which not only has the potential to make Android more secure but will also help many users frustrated with the 15 minute refund window for games which had a huge of data to be downloaded. Thumbs up!

Now hopefully Google will look to address more security concerns like stopping access of personal photos by rogue applications.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Asus confirms next Android version as Jelly Bean

Posted by Unknown 0 komentar
We had earlier reported that Jelly Bean is rumored to launch in Q2 with an aim to target Windows 8 tablets.

Now, according to TechRadar, Benson Lin, Asus’ Corporate VP, has said that “Asus is very close to Google, so once they have Android 5.0 I think there will be a high possibility that we will be the first wave to offer the Jelly Bean update.”


What the statement implies
For one, the candid admissions means that the next version of Android is indeed code named Jelly Bean and there is some substance to the rumours hinting that Jelly Bean will be launched soon, even if not in 2Q 2012.

Delight for Asus' users
This is good news for users of Asus devices, as they could me amongst the first to taste the new OS. Asus was also the first to release Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) update on Transformer prime.
Android platform
If all these rumours are true, Google is releasing Jelly Bean even before ICS has gain any significant traction. According to an earlier Google data, less than 1% of the Android devices were running on ICS.

This means that, as we had earlier speculated, ICS could be skipped by majority of the Android devices and they could jump straight away to Jelly Bean from Android 2.x/3.x, assuming that the device manufacturer comes out with updates. Though devices will continue getting ICS updates, till there is a formal announcement by Google and also for devices were significant work to update them has been done.

Jelly Bean: Target Windows tablets
The early release of Jelly Bean probably has one major objective — to release a version compatible with Windows, before Windows 8 is launched. Microsoft plans to launch the next generation, metro interface Windows 8 OS before holiday season.

With the release, Google will be hoping that Android+Chrome gain a foothold on x86 based Windows netbooks/tablets. While there may be doubts about the Metro interface for full fledged desktops, Windows 8 could prove to be a success in the tablets market, and this is where Google wants to give the users and option to install Android alongside Windows.

This will significantly increase the reach of Android and give developers further incentives to develop on Android. Google will be hoping that previous Android users will be liking the interface and the apps enough to install them along with Windows, a strategy which might work as there will be no extra cost involved in installing Android. Plus, Windows 8 store could take some time to take off, and Google will like to attack Microsoft in that period.

With this strategy, pure Android tablet sales might suffer, but they haven't been very successful so far, especially when compared with iPad. And in spite of the acquisition of Motorola, Google is a "data" or "information" company and not a hardware company, hence more the users using Android, better is the business opportunity for Google.

Baca Selengkapnya ....
Trik SEO Terbaru support Online Shop Baju Wanita - Original design by Bamz | Copyright of samsung galaxy s2.