Tampilkan postingan dengan label Microsoft. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Microsoft. Tampilkan semua postingan

January 2012 US smartphone market share: Google's Android wins; RIM, Microsoft Windows lose

Posted by Unknown Sabtu, 10 Maret 2012 0 komentar

According to the latest data released by Comscore, US smartphone subscribers grew by 3.5% QoQ to reach 101.3 million units in January 2012.

In terms of smartphone platforms, Android and IOS (Apple) continue to gain market share, while Microsoft's share declined in spite of the initial launch of Lumia 710 by Nokia. RIM's market share also declined.

Google's Android and Apple's IOS continue their strong performance 
Android's impressive run continued and it gained 1.3% share in Jan 2012 to reach 48.6% market share.

IOS registered a small decline by 0.1% after gaining an impressive 2.2% in the last three months.

Both the platforms now combined account for an impressive 78.1% of the total subscribers. 

Microsoft's Windows continues to lose market share
Windows share declined by 0.3% in January, in spite of the launch of Lumia 710, which also ranked very high in the initial customer delight rankings.

But, both Microsoft and Nokia would be hoping that this trend will reverse in the coming months, as Lumia 800 and 900 sales number are incorporated.

Nokia has never been able to crack the US market, even in the old days of global domination, and would be hoping that Lumia finally gives it a strong foothold in the US.

For Microsoft also, this will the last big chance, because if Nokia fails, then the Windows platform will be dead and revenues from the the mobile segment will be limited to royalties from Android.

Globally, Nokia's Windows based handsets have done well in 4Q 2011 selling 0.9 million handsets and becoming the largest Windows smartphone vendor with a market share of 33%.


RIM - decline continues
RIM's market share continued to decline, with a loss of 0.8% share in the month of January. Overall, in the last 12 months, RIM's share has halved - from 30.4% in Jan 2011 to 15.2% in Jan 2012. There doesn't seem any near term catalyst for RIM, so expect its share to further decline


US smartphone market share historical trend


Baca Selengkapnya ....

Nokia's Windows Phone: Success or failure?

Posted by Unknown 0 komentar
T-Mobile customer satisfaction
About a week ago Argus Insights said, in a blog post, that Nokia Lumia 710's customers are delighted, in fact far more delighted than iPhone 4S users. While that may appear so at first glance, a detailed analysis shows that it might not be the correct picture. But first, let see what Argus Insight says.

Argus Insights' view
As can be seen from the bubble chart, it appears that the early Lumia customers are delighted with the new Nokia/Microsoft handset Lumia 710, which still records higher satisfaction rate than other devices, especially iPhone 4S.

Lumia 710 is a budget phone targeted at the lower to mid end market, available for ~Rs15,500 (~US$300) in India and US$249+ tax in the US (US$199 for phone + US$50 for activation unlocked at T-Mobile).

Argus Insight says that this has attracted people sitting on the fence waiting for a cheaper smartphone.

Argus then compares the customer satisfaction across categories and that is very impressive for Lumia 710. There are overwhelmingly positive feelers.

All this is great - the last data point shows that Nokia Lumia 710 customers are more delighted than iPhone 4S and they are overwhelmingly positive across categories. Fantastic right? Maybe...Maybe not!


Trend is your friend
While the above bubble chart rightly indicated that the Lumia 710 users are more satisfied than iPhone 4S currently, it will be a lot more insightful to look at the trend.

So let's reconsider the bubble chart with the trend lines (trend lines are approximate since I only have the chart, not the underlying data). We will also extend the analysis from iPhone and Lumia to Galaxy Nexus.

iPhone 4S: Absolutely amazing. Consistent delight, for the entire period under consideration. No wonder it gets rave reviews and continues to sell well.

Galaxy Nexus: Well, look at the trend here. The first data point had much higher satisfaction rate, higher than even iPhone 4S, but after that the satisfaction index has fallen sharply and continues to go down.
Maybe, as the users got to know the phone better, their satisfaction with the phone went down. We don't have the breakup for individual areas, that would have helped us understand the situation better, so let's stop here saying that Samsung may want to look at this in more detail.

Nokia Lumia 710: Lets ignore the first data point of Jan 08, 2012 as its a clear outlier. Beyond that the trend shows that the satisfaction is declining, and rate of decline increased in the last week of Feb 26. So while the satisfaction is still higher, the trend line is going dangerously down. We can only speculate as to the reasons behind the decline.
One way to think of it is that Windows Phone is a very different OS, its UI is unique. Possible most people when they used it for the first time felt the freshness of the new UI and hence the very high ratings. So different was good initially. As time went on and people tried to do common things, some were left frustrated resulting in a decline in satisfaction. If this is the case than it is not very good for Microsoft and Nokia.

Lets try to see if we can gain some insight from the individual categories, even though we don't have individual trends.

The top 2 negatives for the phone are Quality/Reliability and Connectivity followed by battery and apps.

Since the Lumia 710 is targeted at the lower to mid end smartphone segment, the negatives for Quality/Reliability could well be a case of expectations mismatch.

But what is surprising is that Connectivity, for a Nokia phone, is the second most negative. I have always considered this as Nokia's strongest point, and I am surprised by this.  Nokia may want to delve deeper here.

The next two are battery and apps. Apps are not going to magically increase immediately and increasing battery life is not easy either. More than anywhere else, if the trend has turned negative here, it would be a problem, for Nokia/Microsoft.

When we look at the usage chart, what stands out is that the most talked about feature is web browsing. Important categories like social media are not really being talked about, even though a lot of focus of have been on them and how quick Windows can be used to connect to social sites like Facebook. Other categories like Movies and Work are completely absent. Not at all a healthy sign.


If Lumia 710 is not a success than is it a failure?
The above analysis might give a feeling that Lumia 710 is not a success among the early adopters, but that's not true. All it says is that from the available data it is difficult to say if Lumia 710 was a success or not. Mathematically speaking, the null hypothesis of Lumia 710 a success being proven false does not mean that it is a failure.

There are many key things missing from the analysis. For one, Apple do not have many phone variants, while Nokia has too many. Even the Lumia range includes Lumia 710, 800 and 900, so comparing iPhone 4S to just Lumia 710 is not the best thing to do.

Lumia 710 is also a budget phone, so 800 and 900 would have been better comparisons. On the flip side, a lot of the factors relate to the software, which would have been equally valid for the other versions.

Nokia's strategy
Nokia has started off well on the Windows front and has already become the largest Windows smartphone seller in the US with a 33% share, which will only increase in the next quarter.
What Nokia now needs is an complete and single smartphone strategy. Releasing dead end smartphones like PureView 808, no matter how great they are, may not be the best thing to do. Nokia is at an advance stage of closing down Ovi services, and with no alternatives, it will lead to dissatisfaction.

There are rumours that Nokia is developing a budget smartphone OS Meltemi. Nokia might want to steer away from such things as Meltemi will not become a smartphone OS if there is no app support (unless they can have a Windows or an Android app emulator). And if Nokia really needs a different low end smartphone OS, then Symbian and Meego could well be better.
Nokia may want to focus on Windows, even for lower end phones. Microsoft has released Tango update, which will allow the OS to run on lower spec affordable phones. 
In our opinion, Nokia should concentrate all its energy now on Windows as the fates of the two are linked together.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

No more Flash or Office on iPad/Android devices; Microsoft says OnLive violates license

Posted by Unknown Kamis, 08 Maret 2012 0 komentar
Credit: Xoomforums
OnLive, a company providing a cloud based gaming platform, had launched a virtual Windows 7 desktop service some time ago. The service offers access to Windows 7 desktop as well as MS Office, for free.

But in a blog post today, Microsoft has said that OnLive violates its licensing agreements and they are actively engaging with OnLive to resolve the situation.


Free — the real 'innovative' part of OnLive desktop
OnLive desktop was unique as compared to its competitors in that it offered free access to a desktop running Windows. Again, this wasn't just any other version of Windows, but a proper Windows 7 enterprise, as shown by Brian Madden, in an excellent post about OnLive.
Credit: Brian Madden

On top of that OnLive also offered, for free, a real version of Microsoft Office 2010 standard edition (including Word, Excel and PowerPoint) and not a program like LibreOffice which could only open office files.

Credit: Xoomforums
The service also included a paid package which, among other things, included access to Internet Explorer which made running flash apps possible on an unsupported mobile device like the iPad. The paid service was also cheaper than competitors at US$9.99 per month.

License handling
This was the biggest question when the details about OnLive were released, as offering a full version of Windows bundled with Office for free was a too-good-to-be-true deal. The company was never open about how the licensing part of the deal was handled, giving rise to various speculations.

At that time it was known that the company was using the desktops used for gaming. VirtualTal, a twitter user, also speculated that if a dedicated hardware was being used for every instance of Windows, it was probably legal.

This tied in with the company’s assertion that the usage timings of its gaming service and desktop service were completely different, which means that during office timings, Windows + Office would be used more, while after that games would be used more. This also partially explained that there were limited slots for free users.

But what it didn't explain was how Office 2010 standard edition was also offered for free.

This led to speculation that the company might even have been 'sponsored' by Microsoft or got a special license to test waters. Still that wouldn't have been in compliance with Microsoft' licensing terms and today's blog post by Microsoft clearly suggest the same thing.

Microsoft's licensing agreements
In a blog post discussing license agreement for providing desktop like functionalities, Microsoft has said that:
  • Windows 7 in virtual desktop solution can be provided if the end users have licensing agreements with Microsoft
  • Vendors hosting under the Services Provider License Agreement can provide desktop-like functionality as a service by using Windows Server and Remote Desktop Services.  This can be provided to any customer, irrespective of whether they have a license or not. But, the SPLA does not support delivery of Windows 7 as a hosted client or provide the ability to access Office as a service through Windows 7.  Office may only be provided as a service if it is hosted on Windows Server and Remote Desktop Services.
With regards to OnLive, Microsoft says that Some inquiries about these scenarios have been raised as a result of recent media coverage related to OnLive’s Desktop and Desktop Plus services...We are actively engaged with OnLive with the hope of bringing them into a properly licensed scenario, and we are committed to seeing this issue is resolved.

As we have stated before, OnLive used Windows 7 enterprise and Office 2010 standard, clearly indicating licensing violation.


Way forward for OnLive
As Microsoft has clearly said that it is a licensing violation and no special permission were given to OnLive, it seems likely that they will have to eventually agree on licensing terms with Microsoft — if they want to continue with the service.

This means that providing Windows 7 with Office bundled for free will no longer be possible. Also expect that the price of hosting to go up significantly from US$9.99 to more in line with other providers. Customers will have to pay for the license to access Windows desktop as well as Office, which would sharply increase the cost.

This will kill the only differentiator OnLive had, of providing the services for free or really cheap with the pro vision. And after this, we will probably treat OnLive as just another cloud solution, rather than a special one with unique features.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Nokia to shut down Ovi share on May 30; Nokia 808 PureView's users left in lurch

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 06 Maret 2012 0 komentar
Nokia has announced that its Ovi Share service will be discontinued. Users will have time till May 30 to retrieve their content but uploads will no longer be possible from March 13. This move not only signals a move towards Windows services, but could also signal Nokia's strategy in using Windows as the OS even for low end phones.
Move towards Windows services
Moves like this have been long expected as Nokia transitions towards having Windows as its major smartphone OS. Windows Live services are already included as part of Windows which includes Skydrive, a service heavily promoted by Microsoft. 

With this closure, Nokia will further cut costs but will also increase its reliance on Microsoft.

Nokia 808 PureView — Any reason to buy?
We had earlier stated in an article on Nokia 808 PureView that while the phone is great, it is not a smartphone and only those looking for a camera phone should consider it. This news gives further credence to that.

Right now there is not a single native app supporting sharing on Symbian, who will have to resort to using web apps. Neither Nokia nor Microsoft has so far committed to release Skydrive or any other app for Symbian, leaving Symbian users in the lurch.

Also do not expect any major app release for PureView — If Nokia cannot support its own OS, no one else will.

Closing Ovi sharing also puts a huge question mark over future Symbian phones. Nokia had previously stated that lower end phones will continue to run on Symbian. But if the support from Nokia will get progressively lower, Symbian users will be limited to only web apps and some of the bundled apps, which will make Symbian even less exciting, if that's possible.

Way forward for Nokia
The closure Ovi share, while phones like Nokia 808 are still being launched, might point to the strategy Nokia wants to follow. Nokia could look to completely move towards Windows, even on lower end devices, a move which was made possible by Microsoft with the recently released Tango update

We think that might be the best move for Nokia, to shift all its resources to one platform, design great Nokia quality hardware around the OS and once again become a force in the mobile world. Tall ask, but considering the brand value that Nokia still enjoys among loyal users like me, but doesn't effectively use, it is definitely possible. Here's hoping that Nokia's strategy of moving towards Windows pays off.

Baca Selengkapnya ....
Trik SEO Terbaru support Online Shop Baju Wanita - Original design by Bamz | Copyright of samsung galaxy s2.